Lenovo 20F5A15GSG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20F5A15GSG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F5A15GSG
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '19 at 16:49
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 74.3
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 168
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 258
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 504A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5064
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.03
Reflection 8.54
Parallax 5.56
5% 6.71 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.4
7% 7.78 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 366 289 283 301 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 349
Write 279
Mixed 264
SusWrite 317
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 29.5
80% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 318
238% 318 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback