Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2 DDR3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '19 at 19:05
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 87.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 261 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 750 74% 606 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 33.1 Parallax 39.2 30% 36.5 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 38 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 120GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 6GB free Firmware: 1.3. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 125 Write 105 Mixed 131 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 22.9 128% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 111 85% 116 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 101%
Corsair Force 128GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 59GB free Firmware: 5.07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 168 165 157 160 164 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 342 Write 233 Mixed 256 SusWrite 169 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 50.4 195% 74.4 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 138 127% 195 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 126 136 135 158 159 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	78% Very good	Read 134 Write 135 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 139 76% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 69% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.M16 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	60.2% Good	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.5 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 19.4 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2 DDR3-CF

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	40x
Core i3-6100Intel $46Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	27x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	24x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363