HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	17.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '16 at 09:52
Run Duration	308 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 87 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 474 51% 403 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570 19,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 3130) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.0.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.1% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 6.38 Parallax 5.44 5% 6.04 fps	MRender 6.38 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 6.83 5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.1% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 4756490 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 8753143360068 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 876 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 46 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4756490 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4756490 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4756490 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4337 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3274 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3274 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11114	40.9% Average	Read 191 Write 107 Mixed 114 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 12.8 78% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 90.8 DQ Write 90.6 DQ Mixed 34.9 42% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 61%
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145 5,462 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 145GB free Firmware: HP12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 35044633 (03) Spinup time 95 88 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1840 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 13053057510 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9574 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1513 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 71 71 29 (BE) vendor-specific 76 59 403898392 (C2) HDA temperature 24 41 77309411352 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 33 35044633 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	52.9% Above average	Read 90.7 Write 93.4 Mixed 75 65% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.34 91% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 13GB free Firmware: 19.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 145 144 3741 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 49 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 303 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 47 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 25 (C2) HDA temperature 118 95 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	36.5% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 63.5 Mixed 63.8 48% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.37 100% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 69%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	7.83% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 11 Mixed 9.29 15% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.78 4K Write 0.65 4K Mixed 0.43 51% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.83% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-052.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 9905471-052.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.3% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical COMPAQ 8200 Elite Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	1x

GPU
NVS 300NvidiaBench 1%, 2,463 samples	2x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	2x
HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GBHynixBench 44%, 17 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP COMPAQ 8200 Elite

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)