Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '16 at 18:31
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 154 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 259 34% 257 Pts	64-Core 261 16% 261 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Lighting 12.7 Reflection 12.3 Parallax 16.2 10% 13.7 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 12.7 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso 128GB 128GB 1,805 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 69GB free Firmware: O0213E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 587 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 261 (A2) Unknown 100 100 1 (A3) Unknown 100 100 37 (A4) Unknown 100 100 18329 (A5) Unknown 100 100 6 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 91 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 16497 (F2) Unknown 100 100 12311	52.7% Above average	Read 472 Write 152 Mixed 237 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 3.08 70% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 17.6 43% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 96%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 6867378 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -37495064493208 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 217 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 61 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 52 94492688420 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6867378 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6867378 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6867378 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1604 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1546 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1546 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1569	44.2% Average	Read 310 Write 117 Mixed 158 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 66.4 4K Mixed 12.7 79% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.7 DQ Write 63.4 DQ Mixed 9.46 16% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 80%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 1TB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 132GB free Firmware: 0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2574 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6911 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 6734 (0A) Spinup retry count 238 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 777 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 44802 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 214749347869 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 863 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 184 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	52.9% Above average	Read 83.8 Write 101 Mixed 85.7 68% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2400C10-4GTX F3-2400C10-4GTX F3-2400C10-4GTX F3-2400C10-4GTX 16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 20.8 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 14.3 34% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16