Today's hottest deals

Asus CG8480

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CG8480  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8480
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '19 at 19:22
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User MLI-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 151
54% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 534
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841C) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 40.6
0% 24.7 fps
MRender 46.5
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 34.1
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
905GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 164 155 160 166 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 181
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 162
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8480 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback