Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

ASEM BM3400

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	ASEM BM3400 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASEM MB1371
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '19 at 08:35
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820EQ 146 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 102 2-Core 158 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 564 55% 454 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) 213,495 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5065 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Lighting 5.53 Reflection 7 Parallax 5.25 4% 5.93 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 11 6% 7.06 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SATA Flash Drive 240GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: SFPA703B SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 90 99 97 97 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 416 Write 294 Mixed 222 SusWrite 107 58% 259 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 18.5 89% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 127 110% 162 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 1x4GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.8% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 7.9 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 10.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback