Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '19 at 20:47
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Virtual 82d9ed4018dd 40 User benchmarks, average bench 53% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 61.3 38% 59.8 Pts	4-Core 97.9 8-Core 125 14% 111 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 299 299 219 264 247 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 219 Write 304 Mixed 256 SusWrite 271 60% 262 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 10.8 36% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 59.7 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 60.2 45% 59 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 6.9 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.83 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16