Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 152 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 577 51% 435 Pts	64-Core 1,062 66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H700 146GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 129 129 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 549 Mixed 460 SusWrite 130 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 63.8 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 62.4 211% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 220 168% 226 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 4.9 7.7 8.4 8.3 8 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 8.2 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 7.6 15% 13 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.6 166% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 00AD00B380AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 00AD04B380AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 64GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39% Below average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 6.8 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16