Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 4518AA3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 4518AA3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 02:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$158
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 467
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 35.2
30% 33.7 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 300 293 294 294 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 436
Mixed 387
SusWrite 305
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 42.1
134% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
45GB free
Firmware: 0002CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 49 49 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 65.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 48.4
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
19GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.2 4.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32
Write 14.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 2.8
20% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.3
157% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback