Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 169
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 165
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E272) 2GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 35.1
25% 30 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 39.5
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1.5TB
718GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 46 81 32 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
Read 495
Write 60.8
Mixed 247
SusWrite 67.4
47% 217 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 8.9
25% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 38%
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 25 17 22 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback