Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateJul 21 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 458
50% 395 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.9 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 68
Write 34.1
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 11.3
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 77%
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB
50GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 15 16 15 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 16
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback