Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20ARS0E600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 77% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20ARS0E600  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ARS0E600
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '19 at 21:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 77%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 109
55% 86.7 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.48% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 4.22
2% 3.49 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 5.22
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.48%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW180A3H 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 124 77 86 61 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.1% Very good
Read 414
Write 274
Mixed 322
SusWrite 128
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 30.3
125% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 184
162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ8416E6MB-GN-F Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20ARS0E600 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20ARS0E600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback