PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T7610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T7610 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180709 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 27 '19 at 23:38 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
70.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 18 31 44 86 77 MB/s
|
46%
Average
|
|||
Samsung MZ7PC128 128GB
13GB free
Firmware: 7L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 46 46 46 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
387GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 159 163 163 164 164 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B5173QH0-CMA 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 40x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 56x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 41x |
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |