Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '19 at 07:49
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 96.9 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 253 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 823 80% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,054 65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2983) CLim: 1591 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Lighting 90.9 Reflection 94 Parallax 85.7 74% 90.2 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 82.1 Splatting 75 67% 82.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 268 265 264 260 257 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 2,100 Write 1,322 Mixed 1,207 SusWrite 319 274% 1,237 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 69.2 242% 87.4 MB/s	DQ Read 967 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 952 684% 883 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 31GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 301 299 285 258 228 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 460 Mixed 434 SusWrite 296 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 61.7 196% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 358 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 128%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 10GB free Firmware: 000F Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 423 Write 184 Mixed 224 61% 277 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 15.2 106% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 29.8 48% 92.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 895GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 79 83 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 96.7 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 80.9 68% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 90 90 90 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 107 Write 95.3 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 89.9 58% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 171GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 92 94 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 119 Write 107 Mixed 97.7 SusWrite 93.7 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 76%
ASMT 2115 500GB 2,879 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 376GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 37.3 Write 34 Mixed 27 SusWrite 34.8 45% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 166%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB 1,396 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 456GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 39 41 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 33.3 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 40.8 46% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 745 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	130% Outstanding	MC Read 51.3 MC Write 54.2 MC Mixed 46.5 145% 50.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 21.3 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $625

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16