Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 102
54% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 105
14% 104 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8370D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2201.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.12% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 2.31
2% 2.88 fps
MRender 2.29
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 3
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.12%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 79 88 96 102 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 97.1
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 92.4
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-040.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-DS2 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-DS2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback