TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H110M-DGS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '19 at 14:14
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 416
56% 416 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 79%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 58.3
54% 63 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 63.7
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 53.7%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 64GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.3 5.9 6.5 5.3 5.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 188
Write 76.8
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 6.1
20% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 16.9
72% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 14.7
DQ Mixed 16.6
14% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 30.6%
 Great: 31%
Richdisk device 966GB
101GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.4 5.9 6.5 5.2 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
Read 90
Write 32
Mixed 45
SusWrite 6.1
10% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 7.7
32% 8.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 13.7%
 Great: 18%
Richdisk device 752GB
87GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.3 5.9 6.5 5.2 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Richdisk device 752GB
213GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.4 5.9 6.5 5.2 5.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 74.7%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H110M-DGS Builds (Compare 844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DGS

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples140x
Core i3-6100Intel  $51Bench 55%, 110,166 samples104x
Core i5-6400Intel  $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples90x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples73x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples65x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples61x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples30x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples21x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples20x
RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples21x
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples17x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $147
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback