ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131030
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '14 at 22:08
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 113 2-Core 223 76% 168 Pts	4-Core 413 8-Core 628 65% 521 Pts	64-Core 620 38% 620 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8469) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3523 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.5% Poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 25 Parallax 34.8 11% 24.4 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 47 Splatting 45.2 45% 56.5 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 709 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 76 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 61 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1083987040	87.9% Excellent	Read 501 Write 277 Mixed 232 74% 337 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 23.8 136% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 62.6 97% 186 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 740GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 100 142652768 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 78 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1048665 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 713 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 77 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 66 521863199 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2142 (C2) HDA temperature 31 40 55834574879 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 59725815218699 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1486020198 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2232842635	103% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 176 Mixed 48.3 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.37 116% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%
Philips GoGear SoundDot 2GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 2131 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	2.08% Terrible	Read 9.88 Write 1.4 Mixed 4.79 6% 5.36 MB/s	4K Read 1.34 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.009 6% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.08% Great: 4%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	1,179x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	417x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	300x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	189x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	185x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	181x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	98x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $70Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	94x

RAM
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	88x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	65x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $650

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback