Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP540U3C-A03UB
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 56.5
36% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 90
8-Core 89.3
12% 89.7 Pts
64-Core 81.6
5% 81.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 2.62
3% 3.74 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 6.96
4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget E200 SSD 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFC61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 155 173 133 108 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 306
Write 197
Mixed 236
SusWrite 129
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 17.4
85% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 144
115% 161 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback