Acer AOD257

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOD257  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110727
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 45.3
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 12.7
18% 21.7 Pts
4-Core 17.1
8-Core 22.2
2% 19.7 Pts
64-Core 23.2
1% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$33
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 37 31 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
24% Poor
Read 48
Write 44
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 35.6
27% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24%
Great: 41%
ACTIONS HS USB FlashDisk 4GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Read 3.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.3
SusWrite 2.3
3% 2.48 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4D34373142353737334448302D43483920 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
10% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback