Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 16:28
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 191
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 450
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6169
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 6.75
6% 8.6 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 14.5
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 294 203 235 243 210 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 798
Write 1,006
Mixed 752
SusWrite 247
158% 701 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 21.2
75% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 693
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 331
339% 551 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 124 121 121 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 110
Write 124
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 124
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 15.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback