Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 622
67% 530 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 60
47% 61 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 57.5
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D256 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C480903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 131 145 150 138 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 1,329
Write 453
Mixed 573
SusWrite 172
138% 632 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 7.8
78% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 209%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.7 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 130
Write 8.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 9.9
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0747
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback