Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 124 52% 87.5 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 140 20% 145 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.64% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.64% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS128GG4BAAA-NonFDE 128GB 379 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGLA0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 33 42 27 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 159 Write 71 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 29.4 18% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 9.4 30% 9.2 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 15.1 DQ Mixed 12.6 10% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 36%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 24GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 5.3 9.7 9.2 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	4.45% Terrible	Read 7 Write 1.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 8.6 8% 6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.45% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BC1067.M16F 2x4GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.37 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM