ADD TO PC
BUILD

Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Wacom Cintiq Companion 2 (all builds)
Motherboard	INTEL CRESCENTBAY
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150409
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '16 at 19:35
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5557U 1,590 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 112 2-Core 206 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 294 40% 295 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile) 5,403 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Device(1B0A 019B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.33% Terrible	Lighting 8.73 Reflection 9.35 Parallax 9.94 7% 9.34 fps	MRender 7.52 Gravity 7.53 Splatting 12.1 8% 9.06 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.33% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ512GDNU 512GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 304GB free (System drive) Firmware: JUXA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 900 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 492 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 62 49 219044118566 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	103% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 454 Mixed 490 107% 477 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 43.5 135% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 177 169% 264 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 2x8GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Cintiq Companion 2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Wacom Cintiq Companion 2

CPU
Core i7-5557UIntelBench 61%, 1,590 samples	7x
Core i5-4258UIntelBench 56%, 1,278 samples	3x

GPU
Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,403 samples	7x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	3x

SSD
THNSNJ512GDNU 512GBToshibaBench 80%, 225 samples	4x
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples	3x
THNSNJ256G8NU 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 1,940 samples	2x

RAM
A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 2x8GBUnknownBench 51%, 33 samples	5x
A3L-1GS64F3-12E2 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 42 samples	3x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback