Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 11:02
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 60%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 77.2
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 96.2
8-Core 120
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 6.1
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 4.4
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IND-S3N80S/256G 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0529A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 129 16 114 18 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 378
Write 337
Mixed 328
SusWrite 86.4
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.8
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 1.1
35% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback