Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 25.4
2-Core 34.5
26% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 150
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.2% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 3
Parallax 9.6
7% 6.9 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.9
5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW1EA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 420 402 499 443 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 579
Write 411
Mixed 263
SusWrite 421
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 3.4
26% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54414C41522D4E5544 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback