Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '19 at 04:41
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 96
2-Core 171
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 337
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Lighting 9.83
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 11.5
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 12.8
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Iplex 240GB 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-rm
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 156 39 52 39 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
Read 381
Write 294
Mixed 150
SusWrite 88.3
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 16.8
52% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 161
134% 192 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
797GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 108 105 114 103 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 21.8
Write 84
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 104
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 36%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback