Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 64.7 40% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 64.6 8-Core 64.1 9% 64.3 Pts	64-Core 64.6 4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 84 58 75 84 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 90.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 76.6 38% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 59%
Samsung SP0411N 40GB-$30 485 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 16GB free Firmware: TW100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 47 49 53 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 52 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 49.5 35% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.9 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	6x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	5x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	4x
X007-240GB 240GBImramBench 66%, 1 sample	4x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

Value: 31% - Below average

Total price: $64