Sony VPCZ12Z9E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSony VPCZ12Z9E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100730
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '19 at 08:52
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 77.8
34% 55.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 130
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sony(104D 905A) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.91
0% 0.65 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Volume0 256GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 50 78 81 80 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 142
Write 207
Mixed 181
SusWrite 80
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 5
914% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback