Gigabyte GA-H97N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97N  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '19 at 00:00
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 194
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 356
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 1733) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 7.69
5% 7.05 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 7
Splatting 7.04
5% 6.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 173 188 165 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 174
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 174
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
391GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 3.7 0.6 1.4 1.6 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Read 29.1
Write 6.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 3.9
10% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 40%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 137 134 139 135 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 134
148% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
333GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 1.4 1.3 0.6 1.4 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 116
Write 111
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 1.6
92% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 1.8
86% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 19 21 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 20.3
113% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 61%
ST8000DM 002-1YW112 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 203
Write 140
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 3.1
130% 110 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
289% 9.67 MB/s
ST8000DM 002-1YW112 8TB
4TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 160
Write 139
Mixed 101
SusWrite 3.1
124% 101 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 1.1
258% 9.33 MB/s
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
653GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 27 4.5 10 12 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 51.5
Write 24
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 26.8
41% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97N Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback