ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 1962A1G

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 1962A1G (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111101
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '19 at 10:03
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 207 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 307B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.16 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 1% 1.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vaseky V800/64G 64GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 36 44 34 25 23 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 256 Write 225 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 42.1 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 1.6 49% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 69.2 DQ Write 44 DQ Mixed 14.7 22% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 72%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB 4,498 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 809GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.2 6.1 6.5 6.5 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 30 Write 22.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 6.7 15% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 496GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 462GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.5 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 25.3 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 6.4 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 209GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 195GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 6.3 6.1 6.5 6.5 7.1 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 24 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 6.4 16% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 65%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 441GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.1 6.1 6.5 6.5 6.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 31 Write 25.5 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 6.4 16% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	50% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.1 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback