Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIntel SandyBridge Platform
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '19 at 19:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 182
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 459
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 480GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 98 3.9 75 2.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 372
Write 163
Mixed 195
SusWrite 52.8
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 12
59% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 20.5
34% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 148%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 16.4
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 572 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback