Today's hottest deals

PC N15_17RF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC N15_17RF  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO N15_17RF
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 15:51
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 104
2-Core 196
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 547
59% 469 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M
Clevo(1558 0152) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1881
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 31.6
30% 34.8 fps
MRender 27.7
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 25.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 27%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,821
Write 990
Mixed 874
270% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 66.2
252% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,160
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 529
449% 679 MB/s
Poor: 136% Great: 262%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 18 17 19 17 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 103
Write 27.5
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 15.8
37% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N15_17RF Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: PC N15_17RF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback