Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00J6273
Memory124.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 13:02
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 151
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 466
47% 381 Pts
64-Core 1,121
69% 1,121 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110 292GB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 366 370 371 370 368 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
192% Outstanding
Read 2,339
Write 2,256
Mixed 2,334
SusWrite 369
409% 1,825 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 59.5
204% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 292
219% 292 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 192%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K... 128GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 31
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: IBM System x3550 M4 Server -[7914AC1]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback