ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP xw9300 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP xw9300 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 09C4h
Memory	5.3 GB free of 10.001 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20050201
Uptime	23.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 09 '19 at 23:47
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 250 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU1, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 34.6 2-Core 67.4 37% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 66.3 8-Core 68.5 9% 67.4 Pts	64-Core 68.4 4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1400 238 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Nvidia(10DE 0243) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.19 1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 57 57 59 61 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 102 Write 101 Mixed 101 SusWrite 60.9 20% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 24 82% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 18 24% 40.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 193GB free Firmware: 3.AAK SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 68 68 69 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 69 Write 69.5 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 68.4 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 43%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 39GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 41 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 50.8 Write 51 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 40.4 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 35%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 16GB free Firmware: 10.01E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 47 45 46 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 53.7 Mixed 40 SusWrite 46.4 36% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback