QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 10:29
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 220
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 702
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.8% Average
Lighting 55.5
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 55.3
45% 58.7 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 51.9
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 327GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 365 351 343 338 339 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
Read 358
Write 325
Mixed 331
SusWrite 357
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 31
102% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 318
236% 310 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 148 143 153 152 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 136
Write 151
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 149
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 89 92 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 80.2
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 90.6
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 27.5
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback