PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | INTEL_ DP35DP__ |
Motherboard | Intel DP35DP (all builds) |
Memory | 1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20071002 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '19 at 07:35 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.2%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.7%
Below average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 88 34 30 25 25 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
55GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $50Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
Core2 Duo E4600IntelBench 34%, 6,872 samples | 3x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $53Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $239 |