Today's hottest deals

Intel DP35DP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ DP35DP__
MotherboardIntel DP35DP  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 07:35
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 52.9
33% 47.5 Pts
4-Core 92
8-Core 95.1
12% 93.6 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 43.9
37% 44.1 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 36.1
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 88 34 30 25 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 148
Write 216
Mixed 179
SusWrite 63.8
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 31.6
106% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 40.5
DQ Write 83.7
DQ Mixed 46.8
40% 57 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate FreeAgent 1.5TB
55GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 29.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 19.5
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 20%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 29
Mixed 25
SusWrite 19.5
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DP35DP Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP35DP - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback