Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N78 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4N78 PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090209
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 08 '19 at 15:22
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7850
AM2/AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Memory 50
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 41.8
28% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 58.8
8-Core 58.2
8% 58.5 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8300
Asus(1043 82E2) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.19
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.78
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120G 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0527A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 53 72 50 72 52 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 120
Write 88
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 59.6
20% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 5.1
29% 9.37 MB/s
DQ Read 15.9
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 5.5
7% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
296GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 73 53 72 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 86
Write 75
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 61.7
51% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 47%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
360GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 66 49 63 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 72.5
Write 67.9
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 61.3
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.2
8% 2.87 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N78 PRO Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N78 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback