Intel KBL S DDR4 UDIMM CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Kabylake Client platform
MotherboardIntel KBL S DDR4 UDIMM CRB  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '16 at 22:09
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 259
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 567
53% 440 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7586
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 142
Parallax 82.7
107% 119 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 130
Splatting 107
85% 102 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 415
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 32.1
136% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 49.9
107% 220 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 132%
Intel 540s Series 480GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF031C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 512
Write 302
Mixed 214
75% 343 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 20.2
102% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 57.9
72% 127 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 406
Mixed 414
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 33.5
138% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 113
131% 225 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback