Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-1450 APU 558 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	25.9% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 16.3 2-Core 34.3 21% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 66.7 8-Core 54.9 8% 60.8 Pts	64-Core 62.3 4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8250 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 21A8) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.27% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.91 1% 2.1 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.26 2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.27% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LMT-64M6M-HP 64GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: DM61701 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 68 146 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 342 Write 153 Mixed 154 SusWrite 90.7 41% 185 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 16.3 58% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 21.1 39% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 32GB free, PID 0176 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 23 23 25 24 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 21.1 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 21.6 30% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.2 78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB 3,830 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.13 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4210YIntelBench 44%, 596 samples	2x
A6-1450 APUAMDBench 22%, 558 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4200 (Mobile 0.85 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 3,426 samples	2x
HD 8250AMDBench 1%, 1,387 samples	1x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	2x
MTFDDAT064MAM-1J2 64GBCrucialBench 40%, 50 samples	1x

RAM
AM1L16BC4R1-B1MS 1x4GBAdataBench 21%, 190 samples	1x
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	1x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,616 samples	1x