Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2 400 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 51.4 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 164 58% 104 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 772 70% 587 Pts	64-Core 790 49% 790 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150 2,218 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 240A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	7.16% Terrible	Lighting 9.03 Reflection 9 Parallax 7.22 7% 8.42 fps	MRender 8.86 Gravity 6.47 Splatting 9.13 7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 899GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 618GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 146 135 146 150 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.4% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 146 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 145 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.5 292% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-CMA 16x8GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 16 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	MC Read 48.3 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 33.3 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 2.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 155 26% 155 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples	64x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	40x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	56x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	42x
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples	24x

RAM
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 8x8GBSamsungBench 94%, 283 samples	34x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GBHynixBench 94%, 307 samples	22x
18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GBMicronBench 77%, 512 samples	19x