Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core m3-7Y30 4,585 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 104 52% 81.7 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 206 28% 206 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 615 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 11,115 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Lighting 5.93 Reflection 8.46 Parallax 4.69 5% 6.36 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 12 7% 8.48 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTS400S 256GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1225CH1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 107 103 96 81 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 386 Write 269 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 122 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 25 70% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 48.4 96% 193 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung H9CCNNNBJTMLAR-NUD 2x4GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	63.2% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 21.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 22 SC Mixed 16.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	486x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	458x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,365x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	488x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16