Asrock H55M-LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H55M-LE  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101020
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 18 '16 at 16:04
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 379
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Asus(1043 0332) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.1
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.8
10% 12 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.8% Very good
Read 270
Write 215
Mixed 148
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 37.2
137% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 86.3
89% 146 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
829GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 119
Write 141
Mixed 92.2
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.56
148% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Read 7.48
Write 10
Mixed 7.07
11% 8.19 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.14
26% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 42%
ST925031 5AS 250GB
233GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 7.86
Mixed 7.7
11% 8.76 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.36
29% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M-LE Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M-LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback