Intel S3210SH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S3210SH  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '19 at 14:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AND-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3330
Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 76.4
35% 55.6 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 139
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 265-$105
Asus(1043 3011) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 32.2
20% 28.8 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 34.3
23% 27.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 24 39 40 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 45.7
Write 46.5
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 33.3
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
75GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 97 94 99 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 16.3
Write 54.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 92.8
35% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 6 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S3210SH Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel S3210SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback