ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion NC757AA-ABA a6757c

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	9.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion NC757AA-ABA a6757c (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON NARRA3
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 18:47
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9950 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 65.5 1-Core 38.5 2-Core 77 39% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 152 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1452) 1GB CLim: 882 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 9.03 9% 10.7 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 11.1 Splatting 12 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigaston e Prime Seri 512GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 454GB free (System drive) Firmware: S022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 192 194 198 198 198 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.8% Above average	Read 237 Write 193 Mixed 204 SusWrite 194 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 20.4 91% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 25.6 32% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	21.4% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 8 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback