Asus F2A85-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F2A85-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '19 at 22:34
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 64
2-Core 88.7
51% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 209
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 33.2
21% 29.8 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 31.4
24% 28.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fm-25s3- 120GBP3 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GS50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 91 99 91 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 142
Write 97.5
Mixed 150
SusWrite 91.4
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 32.6
118% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 78.1
78% 128 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$66
111GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 72.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 57.4
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL F3-14900CL9-4GBZL 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F2A85-M PRO Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A85-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback