Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Monster ABRA A5 V9.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER ABRA A5 V9.3
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	7.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '19 at 12:46
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 137 54% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 226 28% 215 Pts	64-Core 250 16% 250 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 27.4 Parallax 3.22 4% 11.6 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 6.65 5% 5.62 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 53 57 57 57 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 298 Write 214 Mixed 179 SusWrite 70.3 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 9.3 35% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 23.6 74% 157 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 531GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 94 91 92 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 97.5 Mixed 34 SusWrite 93.4 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.7% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 16.8 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 8.6 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ABRA A5 V9.3 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	34x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	20x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	14x

SSD
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $76Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	18x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x
M471A1G43EB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 42%, 212 samples	3x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04CB 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 1,043 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16