Today's hottest deals

Medion Erazer P6679 MD60748

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMedion Erazer P6679 MD60748  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION D15KHN
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 91
2-Core 134
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 242
24% 198 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Device(1B0A 22CD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.15% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 6.4
0% 7.77 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.15%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 83 78 74 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 22.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 74.3
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Erazer P6679 MD60748 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer P6679 MD60748

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback