Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 28 '19 at 16:12
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 105
53% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 280
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3107) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 19.7
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 13.1
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 20
14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
687GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 174 178 177 178 177 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.6% Good
Read 247
Write 212
Mixed 211
SusWrite 174
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 36.7
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 143
108% 144 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
323GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 132 134 135 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 70
SusWrite 133
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 76%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 120 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 118
Write 88.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 120
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
484GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 84 83 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 53.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 83.4
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
368GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 68 72 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 71
Write 47.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 70.8
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
60GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 118 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 82
SusWrite 117
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 76%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
174GB free, PID 1057
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 23.8
Write 11
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 22.2
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.6
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790XT-UD4P Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback