Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '19 at 00:26
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-2600
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 87
2-Core 185
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 180
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 32GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,030
Write 467
Mixed 600
154% 699 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 19.4
87% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 50.5
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 0.1
13% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
Qemu HARDDISK 16GB
7GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,784
Write 756
Mixed 1,162
410% 1,901 MB/s
4K Read 104
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 80.1
308% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 495
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 155
185% 326 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 12%
Qemu HARDDISK 31GB
14GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 67 70 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
Read 76.8
Write 51.5
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 67.8
48% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
52% 0.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback