Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
MotherboardQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Memory1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '19 at 03:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 22xx (Gen 2 Class Opteron)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 85
32% 56.5 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 109
16% 114 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 59GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 160 178 143 177 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 418
Write 303
Mixed 449
SusWrite 161
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 11.8
43% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 26.5
19% 24.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x3GB
1 of 1 slots used
3GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 13.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.9
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback